Sunday, July 26, 2026

Does Privacy Matter to Us Anymore? And What You Can Do. (Tammy Nichols Jul 26, 2026)


 

For most of American history, following an innocent person took time, money, and effort.

Someone had to physically follow your car, watch your home, search through paper files, or convince a judge that there was a good reason to investigate you.

Today, much of that can be done with a few keystrokes.

Our phones track where we go. Apps collect what we search for, buy, read, and watch. Smart televisions, doorbell cameras, cars, watches, home assistants, credit cards, social media, and government databases create a steady stream of information about our lives.

Then there are automated license plate readers, including Flock cameras. These systems record license plates, vehicle details, locations, dates, and times. When cameras across different cities and agencies are connected, they can create a searchable record of where people travel.

Most people support using technology to find a stolen car, locate a dangerous criminal, or protect the public.

The bigger concern is whether we are building a system that collects information about everyone first and asks questions later.

The movie Minority Reportimagined a future where the government used technology to identify and stop people before they committed a crime. When the movie was released in 2002, that seemed like distant science fiction.

Today, cameras, facial recognition, artificial intelligence, location records, purchasing histories, and large databases can be combined to predict behavior and flag people as suspicious.

We are not living in the world of Minority Report, but its warning feels less fictional than it once did. When the government watches everyone in an attempt to predict who might do something wrong, the basic idea of innocent until proven guilty can slowly be turned upside down.

Technology is also not always accurate. Cameras can misread license plates, facial-recognition systems can identify the wrong person, databases can contain outdated or incorrect information, and artificial intelligence can reach false conclusions. Once a computer labels someone as suspicious, people may assume the technology must be right. But a mistake in a connected system can quickly spread from one agency or database to another. When technology gets it wrong, innocent people need a clear way to challenge the information, correct the record, and hold those responsible accountable.

Fifty Years of Change


Fifty years ago, personal information was spread across filing cabinets, photo albums, banks, doctors’ offices, and government buildings.

Those records were not always secure, but they were separate. It took time and effort to gather them and connect them to one person. Now, much of our information is available online, and in just a few locations.

A federal report from the National Telecommunications and Information Administration found that in 1997, only 36.6% of American households had a computerand 26.3% had a modem. In 1989, only 3.3% of households had a modem. 

Today, internet connected devices are almost everywhere. Pew Research Center reported in 2023 that 95% of American adults used the internet, 90% owned a smartphone, and about four in ten said they were online almost constantly

The growth in the amount of data being created is difficult to imagine. Statistaestimated that the world’s yearly volume of data would reach approximately 182 zettabytes in 2025. A zettabyte equals one trillion gigabytes. 

We have gone from filing cabinets to huge data centers that use large amounts of electricity and water. These centers support artificial intelligence, online advertising, banking, government systems, cloud storage, video streaming, and the growing business of collecting and studying information.

The problem is not only how much data exists. The problem is how easily separate pieces can be connected.

One license plate scan may not seem important. Neither may a store purchase, cellphone location, internet search, social media post, or facial image.

But put those records together, and they may show where you travel, whom you visit, what political events you attend, where you worship, which doctors you see, and what products you buy.

At some point, an ordinary life becomes a permanent digital record.

Privacy Is Not a Left or Right Issue


Privacy is sometimes treated as a conservative issue when government surveillance is involved and a liberal issue when large companies are collecting the data.

In truth, it should concern everyone.

A conservative may worry about government overreach, warrantless searches, gun owner databases, financial tracking, or the monitoring of political and religious activity.

A liberal may worry about facial recognition, medical information, protest surveillance, immigration enforcement, discrimination, or companies selling personal data.

Regardless, both sides should be asking the same question:

Who should have the power to watch an innocent person, and what limits should be placed on that power?

A 2023 Pew Research Center survey found that 81% of Americans were concerned about how companies use the information they collect, while 71% were concerned about how the government uses personal data

Pew also found that 73% of Americans believed they had little or no control over the data companies collect about them, while 79% felt they had little or no control over data collected by the government

Concern about government data use also crossed party lines. From 2019 to 2023, concern among Republicans and Republican leaning Americans increased from 63% to 77%, while concern among Democrats remained steady. 

This is not a concern held by only one political party. It is a warning from a large part of the American public.

Technology does not become harmless simply because it is used by a government agency, police department, popular company, or political party we currently trust.

Leaders change.

Administrations change.

Databases remain.

We Say We Care, but Do We Act Like It?


We complain about being tracked, yet most of us carry a tracking device in our pocket every day.

We dislike companies collecting our information, but we agree to long privacy policies without reading them. We place connected cameras, microphones, televisions, toys, thermostats, and appliances inside our homes.

Pew Research Center found that 67% of American adults understood little or nothing about what companies were doing with their personal data

We often trade privacy for convenience, discounts, entertainment, and speed without fully understanding the trade we are making.

We may agree to share information for one reason without knowing that it can later be sold, stored for years, combined with other records, or accessed by government agencies.

Convenience has become the price we pay for surveillance.

That does not mean ALL technology is bad. It can connect families, improve health care, help solve crimes, support businesses, and make life easier.

But useful technology still needs limits.

Before another camera is installed, another database is connected, or another data center is approved, the public deserves answers.

Who owns the data? Who can search it? Is a warrant required? How long is the information kept? Is it shared with other agencies or companies? Can it be used in private lawsuits? Can false information be corrected? What happens when someone abuses the system? Who pays when an innocent person is harmed?

Those questions should be answered before the technology is put in place, not after the first scandal.

A Generation Rediscovering the Old Ways


Interestingly, some young people who grew up with smartphones are beginning to step back from them.

They are buying vinyl records, film cameras, printed books, wired headphones, paper planners, older video games, and simple “dumb phones.”

Some are taking breaks from social media or choosing hobbies such as gardening, painting, sewing, reading, and journaling activities that do not require an app or create another stream of personal data.

This does not mean an entire generation is rejecting modern technology. Young people remain some of its biggest users.

But there is a visible countertrend.

People who have never known life without constant connection are beginning to see what it has cost them.

They want photographs that do not have to be posted online. They want conversations without constant notifications. They want books, music, and movies they can physically own instead of renting access through monthly subscriptions. They want devices that do one job without tracking everything else. They want peace and their mental health back.

The return of vinyl records is one example. According to the Recording Industry Association of America, U.S. vinyl sales passed $1 billion in 2025, marking the format’s nineteenth straight year of growth. Dumb phones are selling out over and over again through multiple companies. 

“The Best Preparation for a Digital Future is an Analogue Education.”

-Emily Cherkin

Perhaps the return to analog technology is not only about nostalgia. Perhaps it is a quiet form of resistance.

It may be a sign that people, especially the younger generation, are realizing convenience is not always freedom, connection is not always community, and newer is not always better.

What Can People Do?


Protecting your privacy does not require moving off the grid or giving up every modern device.

Small changes can make a difference.

· Review the privacy settings on your phone, apps, social-media accounts, smart television, vehicle, and home devices. Turn off location tracking, microphone access, camera access, contacts, and Bluetooth access for apps that do not need them.

· Delete apps you no longer use. An unused app may still collect information or create a security risk.

· Use strong, different passwords for important accounts. A password manager can help you keep track of them. Turn on two-step verification whenever it is available.

· Keep phones, computers, and apps updated. Updates often repair security weaknesses that criminals may use.

· Avoid sharing too much personal information online. Birthdays, addresses, vacation plans, children’s locations, school information, and daily routines can be useful to scammers and criminals.

· Think before taking online quizzes or posting answers to questions about your first car, childhood street, favorite teacher, or mother’s maiden name. Those answers may be similar to security questions used by banks and other accounts.

· Use messaging services with end-to-end encryption when discussing sensitive matters. Be careful when using public Wi-Fi, especially for banking, shopping, or accessing private accounts.

· Cover or disconnect cameras and microphones that are not being used. Review the privacy settings on smart speakers, televisions, doorbell cameras, and children’s devices.

· Consider paying with cash when you do not want a purchase tied to your name, account, or shopping history.

· Ask local officials questions before surveillance technology is approved. Find out what information will be collected, how long it will be kept, who can access it, whether it can be shared, and whether a warrant will be required.

· Support laws that require clear consent, short data retention periods, strong security, public reporting, penalties for misuse, and a meaningful way to correct or remove false information.

Most importantly, remember that “free” services are rarely free. When no money changes hands, your attention, habits, location, and personal information may be the payment.

Drawing a Line


Privacy is not about having something to hide.

We close the bathroom door even when we are doing nothing wrong. We place letters in envelopes. We use passwords. We expect private conversations to remain private.

We do these things because privacy is part of dignity, freedom, and independence.

People should not have to prove why they deserve to be left alone. The government should have to justify an intrusion, follow the Constitution, obtain a warrant when required, and face consequences when power is abused.

Companies should clearly explain what they collect, why they collect it, whom they share it with, and how people can say no.

This debate should not be framed as technology versus no technology, police versus criminals, or Republicans versus Democrats.

The real question is whether technology will remain a tool that serves free people, or whether people will slowly become subjects of the systems built around them.

The question is no longer whether technology can watch us.

It can.

The question is whether privacy still matters enough for us to draw a line.

In Liberty,

Sen. Tammy Nichols


The Brink of War (movie) - Commentary by Mike King of Real News and History

 * Editor's Note: The 1999 film, Sum of All Fears -- based on a 1991 novel by Tom Clancy -- is about a deadly False Flag bombing / assassination attempt which brings the United States and Russia to "the brink of war." Q and Trump have gone out of their way to drop "comms" about the Sum of All Fears and the song played in the films climactic scene -- "Nessun Dorma.". . 

The World War III "comms" -- combined with the role-played events (movie scenes)rapidly unfolding in the "Wag the Dog FAKE wars still raging in the Ukraine and the Middle East -- keep accumulating week after week. Two more really compelling clues of the long awaited "necessary scare event"(Q lingo)have just come to the attention of "The Editorial Board" here at RN&Hin recent days. Other than stating that the climax of "The Movie" must arrive some day -- and that it will be dramatic as heck -- we, without the actual script in hand, can issue no iron-clad predictions. Suffice it to say that these this pair of really, really weird developments would certainly "fit" the Sum of All Fears climax essentially promised to us. Both will take place in August. Let's have a look: 

 WAR-GAMING THE DRAFT! click here for the rest of the article...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Now...after you've clicked and read the above article and you're fully convinced that the "DRAFT" is coming for you (because we all know now, just like Covid and Event201 and school shooting drills, readiness drills can easily morph into the real thing) and you decide to ditch your electronic dog collars (iPhones), to evade the draft enforcement body snatchers, read the referenced article, in the link below, that Mike King put together a few years ago...to put things in a more calm perspective.  You can still ditch your iPhones, in case Mike King is wrong, or as humorous hedge, you could slip that iPhone into the back pocket of one of those MkUltra victims who still believe in the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax.  That way the military body snatchers can readily find them and whisk them off in the back of one of those black SUVs, with tinted windows, for their much needed "scare" event.]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trump, Putin & Xi Remain "in Cahoots"
As a reminder to NOT be concerned in the case of a WW 3 scare, let us revisit the case for the mighty triumvirate of Trump, Putin, Xi having been working together all along.

Friday, July 24, 2026

The Rise of the Ellison Empire - (by Martin Armstrong of Armstrong Economics)



The Ellisons did not invent this system, but they have become one of its clearest examples. Larry Ellison built the technological empire. David Ellison extended the family’s reach into media and culture. When one family can occupy both the infrastructure of information and the institutions that distribute it, we are no longer discussing ordinary entrepreneurial success. We are looking at the architecture of modern power. 

more...

Thursday, July 9, 2026

On Again / Off Again Fake Wars On Again (Real News and History - Editor Mike King)

The on again / off again "Wag the Dog" movie (Rated Q) purporting to take place in Iran is on again. That's a good sign for us popcorn-munching "film critics" anxiously waiting for the long promised Sum of All Fears FFF (Fake False Flag) moment.

more...

Sunday, June 21, 2026

Will the USA Win a Rigged World Qup? (Real News and History - Editor Mike King)

After two USA wins, the Anti-New York Times stands firmly behind its contingent position: IF the United States wins the 48-nation tournament, it will have been rigged.

Sunday, June 14, 2026

UFC Explained - Free At Last

 



For centuries, America has operated under British Admiralty maritime law—a system quietly reinstated through the 1871 Municipal Corporation of D.C. That's why your birth certificate is a bond. That's why the gold fringe on courtroom flags signals jurisdiction, not decoration. The transition back to land-based sovereignty began on Flag Day 2025. The royal visit in April served as legal witness. The Federal Reserve chairman stepped down. The National Jubilee of Prayer on May 17th marked the withdrawal of consent from the 1871 commercial system. But under Admiralty law, one final ritual remains: the people's visible consent. That ritual is UFC Freedom 250. The octagon sits on sovereign American soil—the same ground where the King and Queen stood as witnesses weeks earlier. The American fighter in the main event symbolizes the people entering the final stage of the conflict on their own ground. When the crowd cheers, their participation serves as legal acquiescence. Whether they know it or not, they are approving the transition. This is the enemy's own tool—ordeal by chaos, Hegelian dialectic, problem-reaction-solution—turned against them. They built the system to obtain consent through spectacle. Now that spectacle is dismantling their system. June 14th delivers the people's consent. June 15th, Trump presents the new order to the G7. June 24th, the rally to end all rallies, with Nessun Dorma—the aria from The Sum of All Fears—signaling the final execution of traitors. Then the Great American State Fair. And on July 4th, the 250th anniversary, America completes the lawful reversal of the 1871 coup. The storm will follow. It will be swift. The old system's protectors will find their exit ramps closed. Order out of chaos. But for a free people under God. Where we go one, we go all.

Saturday, June 6, 2026

The Modern “Red Calendar” And The Death Of Pride Month (by Brandon Smith at alt-market.us)

Complete article here... 

When the activists went after people’s kids, that’s when the greater majority of Americans started to realize that maybe, just maybe, the conservative “conspiracy theorists” of the early 2000s might have been right about a few things. Maybe, LGBT is not about equal rights? Maybe it’s about predatory politics, social control and the normalization of degeneracy?

Today, pride has imploded. Corporate sponsors have dried up along with ESG funding. The shutdown of USAID by the Trump Administration was integral to the death of LGBT Red Calendar celebrations because these groups relied heavily on government money to make organized events possible. As the money disappears, the real LGBT movement is barely noticeable. And, that’s the way it should be.

Anyone who makes their sexual orientation the very center of their identity is mentally ill, and no functional society should promote or celebrate mental illness. An even greater concern, though, is the exploitation of gay “victimhood” as a means to push socialism/communism/globalism.

It’s no coincidence that LGBT activism comes as a package deal with every globalist scam imaginable. To be “gay” these days means you are expected to applaud the deconstruction of the west, the death of free markets, the rise of climate change laws, the normalization of veganism, the end of freedom of speech (for everyone except communists), the systematic destruction of religion, etc.

There are gay people out their who don’t subscribe to any of these things, but the majority of them do, in many cases because they feel they are required to in order to fit in with the movement. It’s not enough to be gay, they have to be revolutionaries.

And this is why public support for gay issues is in decline in the US. This is why Pride Month was barely a blip on the gaydar in 2025 and it’s even less visible in 2026. By whoring out their community to the machinations of communists and globalists, gays really screwed themselves. Now, far less people are trusting.

Pride Month is, by itself, a kind of egomaniacal display of performative narcissism. That is to say, pride is not something to be proud of. Accomplishment is something to be proud of…but being gay is not an accomplishment. Many Americans now see Pride Month as nothing more than an act of self worship.

The pendulum is swinging back hard and I think the “persecution” the LGBT movement pretended to suffer from ten years ago might very will hit them hard in real life in the next few years. It was probably not the best idea to reanimate the communist Red Calendar or declare gays as idols to be worshiped for their “virtue”. The backlash is deserved.

 

Sunday, May 31, 2026

The Real Reason Russia Would Invade Europe (Martin Armstrong of Armstrong Economics)

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/the-real-reason-russia-would-invade-europe/




The press keeps insisting Russia is preparing to invade all of Europe as if Putin wakes up every morning dreaming about inheriting Germany’s industrial collapse and France’s pension protests.

The propaganda has become so absurd that perhaps we should finally discuss the REAL reasons Russia would supposedly invade Europe:

  1. To acquire Germany’s energy policy expertise and finally learn how to shut down functioning nuclear plants while importing expensive energy from everyone else.
  2. To seize Britain’s world-renowned knife-control strategy where criminals ignore the laws while grandmothers get arrested over tweets.
  3. To capture France’s revolutionary spirit, which now mostly consists of setting garbage piles on fire and blocking highways every few months over retirement age increases.
  4. To inherit the European Union’s debt structure because apparently Russia looked at its own sanctions and recession risks and thought, “You know what we really need? Italian debt too.”
  5. To revive the Dutch tulip market and reignite the original speculative bubble. At least tulips are tangible unlike modern sovereign bonds.
  6. To gain control over Europe’s magnificent demographic strategy where birth rates collapse while governments debate banning gas stoves and regulating pronouns.
  7. To seize all of Switzerland’s chocolates, since they’ve already soured their offshore banking.
  8. To experience the thrill of open borders and historic levels of crime in culturally enriched cities.
  9. To inherit Europe’s university system where students graduate with debt, activism experience, and no employable skills whatsoever.
  10. To inherit Europe’s industrial competitiveness, which now largely consists of closing factories and importing products from China while lecturing everyone about carbon emissions.
  11. To govern government’s government by overtaking the European Commission.
  12. To take control of the ECB’s brilliant strategy of printing trillions while pretending inflation was “transitory.”
  13. To secure Europe’s military stockpiles, assuming they can locate them first.
  14. To acquire London real estate prices so inflated they make Manhattan look reasonable.
  15. To learn from Brussels how to regulate artificial intelligence before figuring out how to generate reliable electricity.
  16. To seize Europe’s famous “green economy” where citizens pay some of the highest electricity prices on earth while China builds coal plants by the week.
  17. To inherit NATO procurement systems where a coffee machine probably requires six committees and seventeen consultants before approval.
  18. To finally gain access to Europe’s remaining middle class before they relocate outside of the EU.
  19. To experience firsthand the excitement of driving through fifteen countries while being investigated online for “hate speech” because someone made a joke.
  20. To save the euro before Brussels itself finishes destroying it.

The reality is that the political class in Europe needs Russia psychologically more than Russia needs Europe economically. Fear justifies military spending, centralized power, censorship laws, surveillance expansion, debt issuance, and political unity around failing leadership. Historically governments always need an external threat during periods of internal decline.

Wednesday, May 27, 2026


 

Even Therapists Have Become a Data Mine (Martin Armstrong of Armstrong Economics)

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/ai-computers/even-therapists-have-become-a-data-mine/

There was a time when people could still speak privately. You could sit across from a therapist, talk about your marriage falling apart, your depression, your fears, your finances, or the darkest moments of your life believing those conversations would remain between two human beings. That world is dying rapidly because everything now must be digitized, stored, analyzed, and monetized.

A woman using the therapy app Talkspace discovered that transcripts from her therapy sessions ended up being produced in court during litigation involving her former employer. Let that sink in for a moment. These were not vague notes scribbled down by a therapist. These were detailed digital records discussing her personal life, emotional state, relationships, and finances. The machine remembered everything.

This is what society has become. They tell people to seek help, open up, trust the system, use the apps, go digital, and then they quietly turn human vulnerability into searchable data.

People still fail to understand the danger because they continue believing these technology companies are merely offering services. They are not. They are harvesting human behavior at industrial scale. Every click, every message, every location, every search, every emotional breakdown becomes data to be stored forever.

Talkspace executives reportedly bragged to investors about building one of the largest mental health data banks in existence containing roughly 140 million exchanges between patients and therapists. Human suffering itself is now an asset class. Depression has become data. Trauma has become machine learning material. Your private thoughts are now inventory sitting on corporate servers.  more...

Saturday, May 9, 2026

Soviet Style Trial in Michigan for Criticizing a Politician – A Horrifying True Story

 There is an ongoing case in Michigan that should terrify everyone. Marc Aisen was arrested near his home in December of 2023, extradited to Michigan, and has been held pretrial for over two and a half years.

Most Americans don’t believe the system can be weaponized against ordinary citizens. Judges and prosecutors are given the presumption of innocence and good faith, while criminal defendants are given the presumption of guilt because, “if the government went after them, they must have done something wrong.”

The case of The People of Michigan v. Marc Aisen demonstrates just how far the system can crush a person with the process.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/soviet-style-trial-michigan-criticizing-politician-horrifying-true/

(Note:  This is the type of law-fare and judicial abuse that precedes military martial law, whereby the military takes over our civilian judicial systems or, absent that outcome, revolution becomes the path forward. It would be preferable that judicial activism cease and desist, but this type of activism is cultish in nature and has become a religion.  The option of military martial law, at this juncture, seems like the best way forward.  No sane person desires martial law or revolution, but the judicial activists and their flying monkeys seem to be begging for it.)

Tuesday, May 5, 2026

The Qentucky Derby Rigged Again?

The names of the top two finishers of this past Saturday's Qentucky Derby horse race -- just like the names of last year's top two finishers -- once again represent good triumphing over evil.

Saturday, April 11, 2026


 

Fly Me To The Moon (movie) and its nexus to Artemis II (coincidence?)

Excerpt from Wikipedia:

"As NASA prepares for the historic Apollo 11mission, Kelly suggests broadcasting the moon landing using a television camera on the Lunar Excursion Module(LEM), a proposal Cole dismisses as impractical. However, Moe secretly endorses the idea and reveals an additional, shadowy directive to Kelly: she must prepare a fake moon landing to be aired if the real mission fails, a project codenamed "Artemis"."

Wednesday, April 8, 2026

Q Script: Mossad Met Privately with Trump

Goy-oh goy are the formerly bewildered boobs of the overlapping Kingdoms of Normiedom and Libtardia getting an education here -- in pictures as well as in writing!

https://realnewsandhistory.com/anyt-04-08-26/  (note: if pictures don't show in this link, please cut and paste url in your browser - these pictures are important)

 


Tuesday, March 31, 2026

Grandmother Falsely Imprisoned Thanks to AI Biometrics Fail

 Posted Mar 31, 2026 by Martin Armstrong 

|https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/ai-computers/grandmother-falsely-imprisoned-thanks-to-ai-biometrics-fail/

A grandmother, Angela Lipps, was arrested at gunpoint in her own home after facial recognition software flagged her as a suspect in a bank fraud case in North Dakota, a state she had never even visited. Authorities relied on AI-generated matches from surveillance footage and compared those results to her driver’s license and social media photos. That was enough to issue a warrant.

She was jailed for months, extradited over 1,000 miles, and held without meaningful review until her attorney presented simple bank records proving she was in Tennessee at the time of the alleged crime.

The case collapsed almost immediately, but by then she had lost her home, her car, and even her dog. This is what happens when governments begin to trust machines more than basic investigation.

AI is not intelligence. It is pattern recognition. It compares images, identifies similarities, and produces probabilities. It does not understand context, intent, or truth. Yet those probabilities are now being treated as evidence. That is where the system breaks down. Once a machine flags someone, the burden shifts onto the individual to prove innocence rather than on the state to prove guilt.

We have already seen this before. There have been multiple cases across the United States where facial recognition systems misidentified individuals, leading to wrongful arrests. In each case, the same pattern emerges. The software produces a match and investigators build a case around it instead of questioning it. Basic verification steps are skipped because the assumption is that the system is correct.

The problem is that people assume AI is the end-all, be-all of supreme knowledge. Every output is treated as fact. That is how you end up with someone sitting in jail for months for a crime they did not commit.

This ties directly into what we are seeing more broadly with artificial intelligence. Even inside the tech industry, there are growing concerns about how these systems are being deployed. The recent resignation of a senior figure at OpenAI raised alarms about the pace at which AI is advancing compared to the safeguards in place. Concerns were expressed about the risks of misuse, lack of oversight, and the potential for these systems to be weaponized in ways that were never intended. When those closest to the system begin warning about its misuse, it should not be ignored.

Governments are already expanding surveillance, tracking financial transactions, and building digital identity frameworks. AI becomes the engine that ties all of this together. It allows systems to flag individuals automatically, at scale, without human judgment.

Once that infrastructure is in place, the implications are enormous. You can be flagged, investigated, or even detained based on data patterns that may be incorrect. And by the time the mistake is discovered, the damage is already done.

What happened in Tennessee is a warning of what happens when accountability is removed from the process. It took minutes to prove she was innocent. It took months for the system to admit it was wrong. This is the risk of replacing judgment with algorithms.

Sunday, March 8, 2026

(Excerpt) The Anti-New York Times headline: Iran Now Chattering About "Epstein's Gang"

 The stage is set so perfectly now for an epic backlash against "the usual suspects" not seen since Medieval times. All that is necessary for this hypothetical scenario to come to fruition is the staged expansion of the "Wag the Dog,"and its associated spike in gasoline costs, for at least another two months. Should that play out (as we hope) expect more blame for the fiasco to be openly placed upon the SLS, with whispers of a connection to Epstein Island. Indeed, Epstein name-dropping -- in relation to this war -- has already begun to penetrate "mainstream media." Should allegations of such a connection intensify, our initial hypothesis will be proven correct. If, on the other hand, this glorious little fake war is wrapped up and "won" by the US and its Zionist "ally" by the end of March or so, then it will probably mean that the Epstein Horror Show / 9-11 / JFK / RFK / Butler, PA (fake) / Charlie Kirk (fake) etc. will never be linked to Israel in any meaningful public way.--Mike King (Editor) https://realnewsandhistory.com/__version-1/anyt-03-06-26/